mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com>
To: "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"lars@metafoo.de" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"knaack.h@gmx.de" <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"pmeerw@pmeerw.net" <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	"michael.auchter@ni.com" <michael.auchter@ni.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: adc: ad7291: convert to device tree
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:10:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe501cc7247c3454c21d6c27832d0925f70cfce8.camel@analog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317145113.12413-1-michael.auchter@ni.com>

On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 09:51 -0500, Michael Auchter wrote:
> [External]
> 
> There are no in-tree users of the platform data for this driver, so
> remove it and convert the driver to use device tree instead.
> 

A few comments inline for this.
Sorry if this is a bit late, but since there will be a V3 based on the DT
bindings patch, it's still not too late.

> Signed-off-by: Michael Auchter <michael.auchter@ni.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Fix regulator handling as suggested by Lars
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7291.c             | 33 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  include/linux/platform_data/ad7291.h | 13 -----------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 include/linux/platform_data/ad7291.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7291.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7291.c
> index b2b137fed246..43a201fb4f34 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7291.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7291.c
> @@ -20,8 +20,6 @@
>  #include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/events.h>
>  
> -#include <linux/platform_data/ad7291.h>
> -
>  /*
>   * Simplified handling
>   *
> @@ -465,7 +463,6 @@ static const struct iio_info ad7291_info = {
>  static int ad7291_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  			const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  {
> -	struct ad7291_platform_data *pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
>  	struct ad7291_chip_info *chip;
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>  	int ret;
> @@ -475,16 +472,6 @@ static int ad7291_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>  
> -	if (pdata && pdata->use_external_ref) {
> -		chip->reg = devm_regulator_get(&client->dev, "vref");
> -		if (IS_ERR(chip->reg))
> -			return PTR_ERR(chip->reg);
> -
> -		ret = regulator_enable(chip->reg);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> -
>  	mutex_init(&chip->state_lock);
>  	/* this is only used for device removal purposes */
>  	i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
> @@ -495,8 +482,19 @@ static int ad7291_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  			AD7291_T_SENSE_MASK | /* Tsense always enabled */
>  			AD7291_ALERT_POLARITY; /* set irq polarity low level */
>  
> -	if (pdata && pdata->use_external_ref)
> +	chip->reg = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vref");
> +	if (!IS_ERR(chip->reg)) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(chip->reg);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
>  		chip->command |= AD7291_EXT_REF;
> +	} else {
> +		if (PTR_ERR(chip->reg) != -ENODEV)
> +			return PTR_ERR(chip->reg);
> +
> +		chip->reg = NULL;
> +	}
>  
>  	indio_dev->name = id->name;
>  	indio_dev->channels = ad7291_channels;
> @@ -569,9 +567,16 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id ad7291_id[] = {
>  
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ad7291_id);
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id ad7291_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "adi,ad7291", },
> +	{},

[2]
if updating [1], maybe remove the trailing comma for the null-terminator;
so,  {},  ->  {}
not a biggy, but there are chances that someone else might complain about it
before Jonathan gets a chance to look over this;

> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ad7291_of_match);
> +
>  static struct i2c_driver ad7291_driver = {
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ad7291_of_match),

[1]
not sure if there was a comment about this, but I'd remove the of_match_ptr()
and just assign this directly;
i.e.  .of_match_table = ad7297_of_match,

there is some code that can also handle this OF-table for ACPI as well; I don't
know if this is sufficient for ACPI [with this patch], but it's a good idea to
prepare for that;


>  	},
>  	.probe = ad7291_probe,
>  	.remove = ad7291_remove,
> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/ad7291.h
> b/include/linux/platform_data/ad7291.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index b1fd1530c9a5..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/ad7291.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> -#ifndef __IIO_AD7291_H__
> -#define __IIO_AD7291_H__
> -
> -/**
> - * struct ad7291_platform_data - AD7291 platform data
> - * @use_external_ref: Whether to use an external or internal reference
> voltage
> - */
> -struct ad7291_platform_data {
> -	bool use_external_ref;
> -};
> -
> -#endif

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-17 13:56 [PATCH " Michael Auchter
2020-03-17 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7291: add binding Michael Auchter
2020-03-17 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: adc: ad7291: convert to device tree Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-03-17 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Michael Auchter
2020-03-17 14:51   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: ad7291: add binding Michael Auchter
2020-03-30 21:16     ` Rob Herring
2020-03-17 16:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: adc: ad7291: convert to device tree Lars-Peter Clausen
2020-03-21 23:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-30 20:12     ` Michael Auchter
2020-03-31 10:56       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-31 11:10   ` Ardelean, Alexandru [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe501cc7247c3454c21d6c27832d0925f70cfce8.camel@analog.com \
    --to=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.auchter@ni.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®