mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, helgaas@kernel.org,
	 sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: Increase maximum PCIe physical function number to 7 for non-ARI devices
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:09:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe5d0d5c3cdebc8d637c348f3759330166604bb0.camel@iokpp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37d21806-d964-40e0-a5a5-3173996e601f@ti.com>

On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 17:30 +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> The function "next_fn()" seems to provide the next valid function.
> Therefore, if the current function is 0 (fn = 0), then the next valid
> function will be 1 which is returned by next_fn(). It extends
> similarly
> until the case where current function is 6 (fn = 6) which shall
> return
> the next valid function as 7. So all 8 PFs are still treated as valid
> and there doesn't seem to be any limitation. Only in the case where
> the
> EP doesn't support ARI (there is no function 8 (fn = 8)), the call to
> next_fn() with the fn parameter set to 7, will return -ENODEV which
> seems to be the expected behavior.
> 
> Regards,
> Siddharth.

yes, you are right, the fn 7 has no next_fn, hence should return -
ENODEV. 

ignore this patch!

kind regards,
Bean

      reply	other threads:[~2024-02-19 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-19 11:24 Bean Huo
2024-02-19 12:00 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-02-19 12:09   ` Bean Huo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fe5d0d5c3cdebc8d637c348f3759330166604bb0.camel@iokpp.de \
    --to=beanhuo@iokpp.de \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®