Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/msm/dpu: add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC bits into PP_BLK and PP_BLK_TE marcos

[Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>]

On 5/3/2023 11:55 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 03/05/2023 20:45, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>
>> On 5/2/2023 3:42 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 03/05/2023 00:02, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>> At legacy chipsets, it required DPU_PINGPONG_DSC bit be set to 
>>>> indicate
>>>> pingpong ops functions are required to complete DSC data path setup if
>>>> this chipset has DSC hardware block presented. This patch add
>>>> DPU_PINGPONG_DSC bit to both PP_BLK and PP_BLK_TE marcos if it has DSC
>>>> hardware block presented.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h    | 12 +++++-----
>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h |  8 +++----
>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_0_sm8150.h | 26 
>>>> ++++++++++------------
>>>>   .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h    | 24 
>>>> ++++++++++----------
>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_0_sm8250.h | 26 
>>>> ++++++++++------------
>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_2_sc7180.h |  4 ++--
>>>>   .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_3_sm6115.h |  2 +-
>>>>   .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h    |  2 +-
>>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c     |  8 +++----
>>>>   9 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git 
>>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h 
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
>>>> index 17f821c..b7cd746 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
>>>> @@ -112,16 +112,16 @@ static const struct dpu_lm_cfg msm8998_lm[] = {
>>>>   };
>>>>     static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg msm8998_pp[] = {
>>>> -    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, 0, 
>>>> sdm845_pp_sblk_te,
>>>> -            DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8),
>>>> +    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, 
>>>> BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0,
>>>> +            sdm845_pp_sblk_te, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 12)),
>>>> -    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, 0, 
>>>> sdm845_pp_sblk_te,
>>>> -            DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9),
>>>> +    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, 
>>>> BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0,
>>>> +            sdm845_pp_sblk_te, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 13)),
>>>> -    PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>> +    PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, 0, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 10),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 14)),
>>>> -    PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>> +    PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, 0, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 11),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 15)),
>>>
>>> Just to doublecheck: why don't we have DPU_PINGPONG_DSC for PP_3/_4? 
>>> We do have them on sdm845. Is it because we should not use DSC with 
>>> thos PINGPONG blocks?
>>>
>> I think it only have two DSPP connect to pp blocks
>
> So, can they be connected to PP3/4 or not?

no, my previous reply is not correct.

original i though pp_3/_4 are for write back.

but this not correct, 2 dspp can connect to pp_3/_4 also.

I will add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC to pp_3/_4.


>
>>>>   };
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h 
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h
>>>> index ceca741..8888bd9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h
>>>> @@ -110,16 +110,16 @@ static const struct dpu_lm_cfg sdm845_lm[] = {
>>>>   };
>>>>     static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg sdm845_pp[] = {
>>>> -    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, 0, 
>>>> sdm845_pp_sblk_te,
>>>> +    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, 
>>>> BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te,
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 12)),
>>>> -    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, 0, 
>>>> sdm845_pp_sblk_te,
>>>> +    PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, 
>>>> BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te,
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 13)),
>>>> -    PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>> +    PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, 
>>>> BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 10),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 14)),
>>>> -    PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>> +    PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, 
>>>> BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk,
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 11),
>>>>               DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 15)),
>>>>
>>>
>>> [skipped the rest, looks good to me]
>>>
>