From: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, msuchanek@suse.de,
ritesh.list@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/ftrace: Don't restore r13 during ftrace_regs_caller
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:11:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe7459ab-ddb8-41fa-a770-5bccb504dfe6@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918150811.1743769-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Le 18/09/2026 à 17:08, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit :
> Michal reported a stack-protector failure and subsequent panic when
> running kernel builds. This was observed with full/lazy preemption.
> Initially it was suspected as KVM, but later turned out to be due
> to a bcc tool running in parallel.
>
> Issue was recreated using a bcc tool.
> For example, running below in parallel leads to crash.
> ./funccount sched* -d 100 and make -j 64
>
> The same crash was observed when running kprobe for schedule() function,
> while simpler function tracer for schedule() didn't cause the crash.
> This helped to narrow it down to ftrace backed kprobes area.
>
> The crash occurs as follows:
>
> ftrace_regs_caller entry on CPU A
> |
> +-> save r13 = CPU A PACA into pt_regs
> |
> +-> call kprobe_ftrace_handler()
> |
> +-> ftrace_test_recursion_unlock()
> |
> +-> preempt_enable
> +-> task can schedule and migrate to CPU B
> +-> task resumes with live r13 = CPU B PACA
> |
> +-> REST_GPRS(2, 31)
> |
> +-> restore saved r13 = CPU A PACA
> |
> |-> The task then continues running on CPU B with r13 pointing
> | to CPU A's PACA.
>
> The stack-protector canary is accessed through the PACA. After the task
> migrates, CPU A may run a different task and update its PACA with that
> task's canary. Restoring the saved r13 then causes the migrated task's
> saved stack canary to be compared against the canary in CPU A's PACA,
> resulting in a stack-protector failure.
>
> Similarly, current is resolved through the PACA. With a stale r13,
> preempt_count() can access the state of the task referenced by CPU A's
> PACA instead of the task running on CPU B. This results in corrupted
> preempt-count warnings and scheduling-while-atomic failures.
>
> This path for example is called when using kprobes and parallel kernel builds
> can cause preemptions during ftrace_test_recursion_unlock.
>
> Do not restore r13 from the saved register frame. If the task did not
> migrate, the live r13 already has the saved value. If it migrated, the
> live r13 contains the correct PACA pointer for the CPU on which the task
> resumed.
>
> Fixes: 153086644fd1 ("powerpc/ftrace: Add support for -mprofile-kernel ftrace ABI")
> Reported-by: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> Closes: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fall%2FaqKfsVArHHaIK6M9%40kunlun.suse.cz%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7C47f05d7553a44699e1eb08df1596affe%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C639253409091782376%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yrGFyJtjVk8VFxU5%2BqT4HfxrvTTNPwrQqwn2cLxyT7o%3D&reserved=0
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) <chleroy@kernel.org>
> ---
> PS:
> Fixes is the initial commit that introduced this restore regs almost
> 10 years ago, all commit afterwords are code refactors changing the
> code layout. Also backporting all the way maybe tricky.
> Backport can easily happen till aebd1fb45c622.
Probably not a big issue. That commit is in 5.17. Stable branches 5.10
and 5.15 will be EOL by Decembre 2026.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S
> index 6599fe3c6234..54c8727b48cd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_entry.S
> @@ -220,7 +220,9 @@
>
> /* Restore gprs */
> .if \allregs == 1
> - REST_GPRS(2, 31, r1)
> + REST_GPRS(2, 12, r1)
> + /* Do not restore a stale PACA pointer if the task migrated */
> + REST_GPRS(14, 31, r1)
> .else
> REST_GPRS(3, 10, r1)
> #if defined(CONFIG_LIVEPATCH_64) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_FTRACE_OUT_OF_LINE)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 15:08 Shrikanth Hegde
2026-09-19 6:11 ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe7459ab-ddb8-41fa-a770-5bccb504dfe6@kernel.org \
--to=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®