From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Yaohui Wang <yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
luoben@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kernel/resource: fix boundary judgment issues in find_next_iomem_res() and __walk_iomem_res_desc()
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 09:29:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff01e0a6-eed0-9a9a-8161-ac35cd4f948a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210621123419.2976-3-yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com>
On 6/21/21 5:34 AM, Yaohui Wang wrote:
> Memory resources are described with the start address and the inclusive
> end address, which means for a resource with 1 byte length the start
> address is the same as the end address.
Is it just me or does this little "feature" of the resource code
continue to bite us over and over?
It might be some time for some unit tests for kernel/resource.c.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-01 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-21 12:34 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/ioremap: fix boundary calculation and boundary judgment issues for ioremap() Yaohui Wang
2021-06-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/ioremap: fix the pfn calculation mistake in __ioremap_check_ram() Yaohui Wang
2021-07-01 14:41 ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-02 10:05 ` Yaohui Wang
2021-07-02 14:49 ` Dave Hansen
2021-07-05 2:11 ` Yaohui Wang
2021-06-21 12:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] kernel/resource: fix boundary judgment issues in find_next_iomem_res() and __walk_iomem_res_desc() Yaohui Wang
2021-07-01 16:29 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-07-01 2:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/ioremap: fix boundary calculation and boundary judgment issues for ioremap() Yaohui Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff01e0a6-eed0-9a9a-8161-ac35cd4f948a@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoben@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yaohuiwang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®