From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: "Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: Remove config dependency in XEN_PRIVCMD definition
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:18:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff3c00b1-b626-4de2-b797-8dd03c4d70f1@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL1PR12MB5849650F8CB4606143C403F1E7782@BL1PR12MB5849.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3538 bytes --]
On 10.10.24 09:07, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/10/10 13:39, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 10.10.24 00:46, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2024, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.10.2024 08:20, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>>>> Commit 2fae6bb7be32 ("xen/privcmd: Add new syscall to get gsi from dev")
>>>>> adds a weak reverse dependency to the config XEN_PRIVCMD definition, its
>>>>> purpose is to pass the combination of compilation that CONFIG_XEN_PRIVCMD=y
>>>>> and CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND=m, because in that combination, xen-pciback
>>>>> is compiled as a module but xen-privcmd is built-in, so xen-privcmd can't
>>>>> find the implementation of pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf.
>>>>>
>>>>> But that dependency causes xen-privcmd can't be loaded on domU, because
>>>>> dependent xen-pciback is always not be loaded successfully on domU.
>>>>>
>>>>> To solve above problem and cover original commit's requirement, just remove
>>>>> that dependency, because the code "IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND)"
>>>>> of original commit is enough to meet the requirement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 2fae6bb7be32 ("xen/privcmd: Add new syscall to get gsi from dev")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> This lacks a Reported-by:.
>>>>
>>>>> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ config XEN_SCSI_BACKEND
>>>>> config XEN_PRIVCMD
>>>>> tristate "Xen hypercall passthrough driver"
>>>>> depends on XEN
>>>>> - imply XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND
>>>>> default m
>>>>> help
>>>>> The hypercall passthrough driver allows privileged user programs to
>>>>
>>>> The report wasn't about a build problem, but a runtime one. Removing the
>>>> dependency here doesn't change anything in the dependency of xen-privcmd
>>>> on xen-pciback, as the use of pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf() continues to
>>>> exist.
>>>>
>>>> Consider the case of XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND=m and XEN_PRIVCMD=m, which
>>>> I guess is what Marek is using in his config. Both drivers are available
>>>> in such a configuration, yet loading of xen-privcmd then requires to
>>>> load xen-pciback first. And that latter load attempt will fail in a DomU.
>>>> The two drivers simply may not have any dependency in either direction.
>>>
>>> The idea is that there should be no hard dependency on
>>> pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf(). If it is available, the service will be
>>> used, otherwise an error will be reported.
>>>
>>> The problem is that IS_REACHABLE is a compile-time check. What we need
>>> is a runtime check instead. Maybe symbol_get or try_module_get ?
>>
>> This is a rather clumsy solution IMO.
>>
>> I'm seeing the following solutions:
>>
>> 1. Don't fail to to load the pciback driver in a DomU, but only disable
>> any functionality.
>>
>> 2. Move the drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c functionality in a module
>> of its own, allowing the privcmd driver to be loaded without needing
>> the rest of pciback.
>>
>> 3. Add a hook to e.g. drivers/xen/pci.c instead for calling of
>> pcistub_get_gsi_from_sbdf() directly. pciback could register the real
>> call address. If pciback isn't loaded, the hook can return an error.
>> This would remove the explicit dependency of privcmd on pciback.
>>
>> I'd prefer the 3rd variant.
> Thanks, I will send changes in v2 soon.
> And I prefer to add the hook in drivers/xen/acpi.c
Agreed.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 6:20 Jiqian Chen
2024-10-09 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-09 22:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-10-10 5:39 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-10-10 7:01 ` Jan Beulich
2024-10-10 7:21 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-10-10 7:07 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-10-10 7:18 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff3c00b1-b626-4de2-b797-8dd03c4d70f1@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=Jiqian.Chen@amd.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®