From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@st.com>,
wim@linux-watchdog.org, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@st.com
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] drivers: watchdog: stm32_iwdg: set WDOG_HW_RUNNING at probe
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 02:45:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffa20f2f-1ca2-9d8f-6594-33b906cbb74a@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191122082442.21695-1-christophe.roullier@st.com>
On 11/22/19 12:24 AM, Christophe Roullier wrote:
> If the watchdog hardware is already enabled during the boot process,
> when the Linux watchdog driver loads, it should start/reset the watchdog
> and tell the watchdog framework. As a result, ping can be generated from
> the watchdog framework (if CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED is set),
> until the userspace watchdog daemon takes over control
>
> Fixes:4332d113c66a ("watchdog: Add STM32 IWDG driver")
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Roullier <christophe.roullier@st.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> According to Guenter
> I follow the guidance from intel-mid_wdt.c
> and I added test to check if CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED is set
> because we need to be flexible (depends on customer config, but watchdog
> not always start by bootloader (Uboot, ..))
> I've tested some config and it is working as expected:
> Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE is not set + daemon watchdog in userland ON ==> No reset IWDG2
> Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE is not set ==> Reset IWDG2
> Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y ==> No reset IWDG2
> Watchdog enable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y + daemon watchdog in userland ON puis OFF ==> Reset IWDG2
> Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE is not set ==> No reset IWDG2
> Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y ==> No reset IWDG2
> Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y + daemon watchdog in userland ON ==> No reset IWDG2
> Watchdog disable in Uboot + HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLE=y + daemon watchdog in userland ON puis OFF ==> Reset IWDG2
>
> Thanks,
> Christophe
>
> drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c b/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c
> index a3a329011a06..7f454a6e17ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/stm32_iwdg.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@
> #define TIMEOUT_US 100000
> #define SLEEP_US 1000
>
> +static bool handle_boot_enabled =
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED);
> +
> struct stm32_iwdg_data {
> bool has_pclk;
> u32 max_prescaler;
> @@ -262,6 +265,24 @@ static int stm32_iwdg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> watchdog_set_nowayout(wdd, WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT);
> watchdog_init_timeout(wdd, 0, dev);
>
> + /*
> + * In case of CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED is set
> + * (Means U-Boot/bootloaders leaves the watchdog running)
> + * When we get here we should make a decision to prevent
> + * any side effects before user space daemon will take care of it.
> + * The best option, taking into consideration that there is no
> + * way to read values back from hardware, is to enforce watchdog
> + * being run with deterministic values.
> + */
> + if (handle_boot_enabled) {
You don't need that variable. Just use
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HANDLE_BOOT_ENABLED)) {
directly.
> + ret = stm32_iwdg_start(wdd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Make sure the watchdog is serviced */
> + set_bit(WDOG_HW_RUNNING, &wdd->status);
> + }
> +
> ret = devm_watchdog_register_device(dev, wdd);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-22 8:24 Christophe Roullier
2019-11-22 10:28 ` [Linux-stm32] " Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-22 13:15 ` Christophe ROULLIER
2019-11-22 13:31 ` Ahmad Fatoum
2019-11-22 10:45 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ffa20f2f-1ca2-9d8f-6594-33b906cbb74a@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=christophe.roullier@st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®