mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] mailbox: arm: introduce smc triggered mailbox
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 12:50:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ffabbe33-5edd-4642-6038-5b48c87ad372@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500852206-28771-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

On 24.07.17 01:23, Andre Przywara wrote:
> This is a reworked version of my previous post. It addresses Jassi's
> comments on the driver and also tries to cover Rob's and Mark's comments
> on the binding documentation.
> I dropped the more example-like DT changes from v1, as they are actually
> not meant to be merged into the Linux tree, but instead are provided as
> part of some firmware actually implementing this functionality.
> 
> Please let me know what you think.

Could you please quickly explain what it would take to provide SCMI on 
top of this instead of SCPI?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/7/624

I can certainly see that SCPI is an easier target because it's already 
upstream and widely spread. But wouldn't it make sense to jump on the 
SCMI train while it's taking steam?


Thanks,

Alex

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-01 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-23 23:23 Andre Przywara
2017-07-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] DT: mailbox: add binding doc for the ARM SMC mailbox Andre Przywara
2017-08-03 16:46   ` Rob Herring
2017-07-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox Andre Przywara
2017-07-31 17:34   ` Alexey Klimov
2017-08-01 16:06   ` Jassi Brar
2017-07-23 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mailbox: Kconfig: enable ARM SMC mailbox on 64-bit Allwinner SoCs Andre Przywara
2017-08-01 10:50 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2017-08-01 15:50   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mailbox: arm: introduce smc triggered mailbox Jassi Brar
2017-08-02 16:54     ` Sudeep Holla
2017-08-17  9:57   ` Andre Przywara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ffabbe33-5edd-4642-6038-5b48c87ad372@suse.de \
    --to=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=icenowy@aosc.xyz \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®