Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in arm_iommu_detach_device()"

[Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>]

Hello everyone,

first of all thanks to Marek for looking into this.

@Robin: This works for me. The drivers now probe and bind correctly again.

With best wishes,
Tobias

Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 14/01/2019 16:09, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 02:22:40PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> This reverts commit 1874619a7df4b14b23b14877e705ae15325773e3.
>>>
>>> That patch broke IOMMU support for devices, which fails to probe for the
>>> first time and use deferred probe approach. When non-NULL dma_ops is set
>>> in arm_iommu_detach_device(), the given device later ignored by
>>> arch_setup_dma_ops() and stays with non-IOMMU dma_ops.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
>>> Fixes: 1874619a7df4 "ARM: dma-mapping: Set proper DMA ops in
>>> arm_iommu_detach_device()"
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> Can you point out exactly what drivers break because of this change? We
>> need to find a solution that works for everyone. Reverting is only
>> marginally useful because somebody will just end up wanting to revert
>> the revert because a different driver is now broken.
> 
> At first glance, it sounds like what we really want is for
> arch_teardown_iommu_ops() to completely clear any ops that arch_setup_dma_ops()
> installed - does the below suffice?
> 
> Robin.
> 
> ----->8-----
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index f1e2922e447c..1e3e08a1c456 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -2390,4 +2390,6 @@ void arch_teardown_dma_ops(struct device *dev)
>          return;
> 
>      arm_teardown_iommu_dma_ops(dev);
> +    /* Let arch_setup_dma_ops() start again from scratch upon re-probe */
> +    set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
>  }