Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: cros_ec: check for NULL transfer function

[Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>]

Hi Enrico,

Many thanks to send this upstream.

On 4/4/19 18:00, Jett ✈ Rink wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Jett Rink <jettrink@chromium.org>
> 
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 4:40 PM <egranata@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Enrico Granata <egranata@chromium.org>
>>
>> As new transfer mechanisms are added to the EC codebase, they may
>> not support v2 of the EC protocol.
>>
>> If the v3 initial handshake transfer fails, the kernel will try
>> and call cmd_xfer as a fallback. If v2 is not supported, cmd_xfer
>> will be NULL, and the code will end up causing a kernel panic.
>>
>> Add a check for NULL before calling the transfer function, along
>> with a helpful comment explaining how one might end up in this
>> situation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
>> index 97a068dff192d..55691656a3c27 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
>> @@ -56,6 +56,16 @@ static int send_command(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
>>         else
>>                 xfer_fxn = ec_dev->cmd_xfer;
>>
>> +       if (xfer_fxn == NULL) {
>> +               /* This error can happen if a communication error happened and

Like Guenter I personally don't like the networking-style multi-line comments.
We try to use the default kernel-style so if you don't mind I'll change this.


>> +                * the EC is trying to use protocol v2, on an underlying
>> +                * communication mechanism that does not support v2.
>> +                */
>> +               dev_err_once(ec_dev->dev,
>> +                       "missing EC transfer API, cannot send command\n");
>> +               return -EIO;
>> +       }
>> +
>>         ret = (*xfer_fxn)(ec_dev, msg);
>>         if (msg->result == EC_RES_IN_PROGRESS) {
>>                 int i;
>> --
>> 2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog
>>

I'll add the patch to the for-next branch in chrome-platform repository for
auto-builders to play with. If all goes well I'll queue the patch for
chrome-platform-5.2.

Thanks,
 Enric