From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm: fix uninitialized ZONE_DEVICE struct pages with PMDs
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 21:15:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <h5i4wlx5.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029063601.1961415-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> writes:
Thanks Muchun,
> PowerPC radix vmemmap population can reuse an existing PMD mapping while
> populating a device DAX range whose section is marked as HVO-enabled. The
> reused mapping is an ordinary vmemmap mapping: the redundant tail struct
> pages are not remapped to the shared tail page.
>
> Leaving the section marked as HVO-enabled makes later ZONE_DEVICE
> initialization treat the range as optimized and initialize only the struct
> pages that would be backed by a real HVO mapping. The remaining tail struct
> pages can then be left uninitialized even though they are still used as
> metadata for the device DAX compound page.
>
> This first triggers a zone mismatch warning in __init_single_page(), then
> faults while initializing the pageblock flags:
>
> WARNING: mm/mm_init.c:600 at __init_single_page+0xd0/0xf4
> Call Trace:
> memmap_init_zone_device+0x164/0x430
> memremap_pages+0x43c/0x93c
> devm_memremap_pages+0x3c/0xa4
> dev_dax_probe+0x264/0x3d0
> dax_bus_probe+0x140/0x1c8
>
> BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00001400
> __set_pfnblock_flags_mask.constprop.0+0x34/0x160
> memmap_init_zone_device+0x358/0x430
>
> On kernels without these initialization-time diagnostics, the
> uninitialized metadata remains latent. When userspace later maps and
> accesses the affected device DAX range, the kernel operates on those struct
> pages and panics at that point instead of during device initialization.
>
> The Fixes target predates the section-based vmemmap optimization
> infrastructure, so older kernels do not have section state that can be
> marked non-HVO. Backports to such kernels need to handle the PMD-reuse case
> in powerpc radix code directly, for example by initializing the tail struct
> pages that core ZONE_DEVICE initialization would otherwise skip.
>
Actually that would be totally new code right? It won't be a straight
forward backport, correct? ...
> Mark the section as non-HVO when reusing an existing PMD mapping, so the
> section's HVO state matches the actual vmemmap layout and all required
> struct pages are initialized.
>
> Fixes: f2b79c0d7968 ("powerpc/book3s64/radix: add support for vmemmap optimization for radix")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
... then should we mark Cc: stable here with the above mentioned fixes
tag? Because this patch cannot be backported as is to older kernels -
for the reasons you mentioned above.
> Reported-by: Pavithra <pavrampu@linux.ibm.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/97f85592bb78a273be8519e6897e7f9b9bd31469.1793070429.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
I think, this patch should go via mm tree, due to all the dependencies
coming from there, right?
-ritesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 6:36 Muchun Song
2026-10-29 15:45 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2026-10-30 3:03 ` Muchun Song
2026-10-30 6:42 ` pavrampu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=h5i4wlx5.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=pavrampu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®