From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756498AbXIEHtf (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:49:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755789AbXIEHt2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:49:28 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:44077 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753618AbXIEHt1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2007 03:49:27 -0400 To: James Pearson Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Guy Streeter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ? References: <4474B7DB.8000304@moving-picture.com> <200605242029.k4OKTn9C031700@terminus.zytor.com> <447EF58C.6000605@moving-picture.com> <52dd17640708150954q798d137cn1b07739785917c5b@mail.gmail.com> <46C33700.1060605@zytor.com> <46D6CBED.4040301@moving-picture.com> From: Anton Arapov X-URL: http://people.redhat.com/aarapov Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:49:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <46D6CBED.4040301@moving-picture.com> (James Pearson's message of "Thu\, 30 Aug 2007 14\:53\:49 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey guys, the future of this patch is important for me. What do you think, has this patch any chances to be committed to upstream? James Pearson writes: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: > There isn't that much that is duplicated - and there are also bits of > the /proc/PID/mem code that are not needed in this case, so I'm not > really sure if it is worth doing. > > I did submit a patch a few months ago - see: > > -- Anton Arapov,