From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757238AbXIROKW (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:10:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754735AbXIROKJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:10:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:59458 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754703AbXIROKI (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:10:08 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: James Pearson , Jan Engelhardt , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexey Dobriyan , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: 4096 byte limit to /proc/PID/environ ? References: From: Anton Arapov X-URL: http://people.redhat.com/aarapov Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:09:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: (James Pearson's message of "Thu\, 6 Sep 2007 17\:38\:04 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi fellas! What we can do for this patch? It looks like ignored at all? I want reinitiate this thread because I want to have the answer! What do you think? "James Pearson" writes: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Right, also please use use checkpatch.pl. > OK - how about: > > /proc/PID/environ currently truncates at 4096 characters, patch based on > the /proc/PID/mem code. > > Patch against 2.6.23-rc5 > > Signed-off-by: James Pearson [...patch_skipped...] -- Anton Arapov,