From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757861AbaEPQaY (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 12:30:24 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60368 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756434AbaEPQaW (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 12:30:22 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf Subject: Re: 3.14.4 Kernel BUG at fs/namei.c : KDE's kate + ecryptfs + BTRFS + LVM2 + LUKS Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 20:16:41 +0530 Organization: RESEARCHUT Message-ID: References: <1496827.xlXt6pDnuG@zafu> Reply-To: rrs@researchut.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 27.7.162.194 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <1496827.xlXt6pDnuG@zafu> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/16/2014 06:36 PM, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote: > Underlying is ecryptfs over BTRFS over LVM2 over LUKS (what else ?) I recently switched one of my drives to BTRFS because I wanted transparent compression. Since I also needed encryption, I chose: BTRFS => LUKS (Device Mapper) => SCSI Block. Is there any value having LVM2 and ecryptfs in the way you have stacked ? Just curious. -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for quicker response