From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262497AbUKDXr7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:47:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262501AbUKDXr7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:47:59 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:26563 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262497AbUKDXr5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:47:57 -0500 To: Olaf Hering Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fix initcall_debug on ppc64/ia64 References: <20041102195130.GA13589@suse.de> <20041103152628.19753cf2.akpm@osdl.org> <20041104210547.GA16238@suse.de> From: Andreas Schwab X-Yow: Let's go to CHURCH! Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:47:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20041104210547.GA16238@suse.de> (Olaf Hering's message of "Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:05:47 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Olaf Hering writes: > On Wed, Nov 03, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> Olaf Hering wrote: >> > >> > Is a patch like that acceptable (for mainline)? Currently only the >> > descriptor is printed, not the function itself. Another redirection is >> > needed. >> >> Is this acked by Paul and Anton? If so, I'll replace __powerpc64__ with >> CONFIG_PPC64 and run with it. > > > I guess we need something like this. > Just where to put it, how to name it and how to handle ia64: The ia64 version should be identical. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."