Re: x86_64: 32bit emulation problems

[Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>]

Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@web.de> writes:

>> It is most likely some kind of user space problem.  I would change
>> it to int err = stat(dir, &buf);
>> and then go through it with gdb and see what value err gets assigned.
>>
>> I cannot see any kernel problem.
>
> The err value will become -1 here.

That's because there are some values in the stat64 buffer delivered by the
kernel which cannot be packed into the stat buffer that you pass to stat.
Use stat64 or _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.

>  Trond Myklebust already suggested to look at the results of errno:
>
> On Tuesday 01 March 2005 00:43, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>> On Monday 28 February 2005 23:26, you wrote:
>> > Given that strace shows that both syscalls (stat64() and stat())
>> > succeed,

The trace does not say anything about the user-level stat().

>> bernd@hitchcock tests>./test_stat32 /mnt/test/yp
>> stat for /mnt/test/yp failed
>> ernno: 75 (Value too large for defined data type)
>>
>> But why does stat64() on a 64-bit kernel tries to fill in larger data than
>> on a 32-bit kernel and larger data also only for nfs-mount points? Hmm, I
>> will tomorrow compare the tcp-packges sent by the server.
>
> So I still think thats a kernel bug.

This has nothing to do with the kernel.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."