mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	gleb@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: Wrong register masking in 64-bit mode
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 10:50:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpglhudej88.fsf@nelium.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399465972-4026-5-git-send-email-namit@cs.technion.ac.il> (Nadav Amit's message of "Wed, 7 May 2014 15:32:51 +0300")

Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il> writes:

> 32-bit operations are zero extended in 64-bit mode. Currently, the code does
> not handle them correctly and keeps the high bits. In 16-bit mode, the high
> 32-bits are kept intact.
>
> In addition, although it is not well-documented, when address override prefix

It would be helpful to have a pointer in the SDM especially for cases 
that are not well-documented.

> is used with REP-string instruction, RCX high half is zeroed even if ECX was
> zero on the first iteration (as if an assignment was performed to ECX).
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index 743e8e3..6833b41 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -434,9 +434,21 @@ static int emulator_check_intercept(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>  	return ctxt->ops->intercept(ctxt, &info, stage);
>  }
>  
> -static void assign_masked(ulong *dest, ulong src, ulong mask)
> +static void assign_masked(ulong *dest, ulong src, int bytes)
>  {
> -	*dest = (*dest & ~mask) | (src & mask);
> +	switch (bytes) {
> +	case 2:
> +		*dest = (u16)src | (*dest & ~0xfffful);
> +		break;
> +	case 4:
> +		*dest = (u32)src;
> +		break;
> +	case 8:
> +		*dest = src;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		BUG();

IIRC, Paolo mentioned that a WARN() is preferable. But I see
a lot other places where BUG() is called, maybe, he can confirm.

> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned long ad_mask(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> @@ -476,26 +488,20 @@ register_address(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long reg)
>  	return address_mask(ctxt, reg);
>  }
>  
> -static void masked_increment(ulong *reg, ulong mask, int inc)
> +static void masked_increment(ulong *reg, int size, int inc)
>  {
> -	assign_masked(reg, *reg + inc, mask);
> +	assign_masked(reg, *reg + inc, size);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
>  register_address_increment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned long *reg, int inc)
>  {
> -	ulong mask;
> -
> -	if (ctxt->ad_bytes == sizeof(unsigned long))
> -		mask = ~0UL;
> -	else
> -		mask = ad_mask(ctxt);
> -	masked_increment(reg, mask, inc);
> +	masked_increment(reg, ctxt->ad_bytes, inc);
>  }
>  
>  static void rsp_increment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int inc)
>  {
> -	masked_increment(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), stack_mask(ctxt), inc);
> +	masked_increment(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), stack_size(ctxt), inc);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void jmp_rel(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int rel)
> @@ -1712,17 +1718,17 @@ static int em_enter(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>  		return rc;
>  	assign_masked(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP), reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP),
> -		      stack_mask(ctxt));
> +		      stack_size(ctxt));
>  	assign_masked(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP),
>  		      reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP) - frame_size,
> -		      stack_mask(ctxt));
> +		      stack_size(ctxt));
>  	return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>  }
>  
>  static int em_leave(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  {
>  	assign_masked(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP),
> -		      stack_mask(ctxt));
> +		      stack_size(ctxt));
>  	return emulate_pop(ctxt, reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RBP), ctxt->op_bytes);
>  }
>  
> @@ -4570,6 +4576,8 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>  	if (ctxt->rep_prefix && (ctxt->d & String)) {
>  		/* All REP prefixes have the same first termination condition */
>  		if (address_mask(ctxt, reg_read(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX)) == 0) {
> +			assign_masked(reg_write(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RCX), 0,
> +				      ctxt->ad_bytes);
>  			ctxt->eip = ctxt->_eip;
>  			goto done;
>  		}

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-07 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-07 12:32 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: Fix exit handler and emulation bugs Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: Emulator does not calculate address correctly Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 13:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-07 15:21     ` Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: vmx: handle_dr does not handle RSP correctly Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: x86: Mark bit 7 in long-mode PDPTE according to 1GB pages support Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: Wrong register masking in 64-bit mode Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 14:50   ` Bandan Das [this message]
2014-05-07 15:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-07 16:11     ` Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 15:52   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 12:27     ` Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: x86: Fix wrong masking on relative jump/call Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 14:43   ` Bandan Das
2014-05-07 15:57     ` Nadav Amit
2014-05-07 15:59   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-07 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: x86: Fix exit handler and emulation bugs Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jpglhudej88.fsf@nelium.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=bsd@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®