From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 26 May 2001 18:58:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 26 May 2001 18:58:46 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:20647 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 26 May 2001 18:58:37 -0400 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:11:13 -0700 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Jaswinder Singh" Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > The OS resides on disk, yes. I suppose I could plunk a minimal > system into ramfs, pivot_root and umount disk, but I don't see > any way that could matter for a memory leak. > It is very difficult to see memory leak , with hard disks . As i told you , in my case i am using no harddisks , only thing i have is RAM , so i am using only Ramdisk and ramfs, so in my case my Ram will full within few minutes and My machine hangs . Thanks , Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di.