From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932400AbWGLDz0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:55:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932403AbWGLDz0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:55:26 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36776 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932400AbWGLDzY (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:55:24 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ask List Subject: Re: Runnable threads on run queue Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <44B0BF4F.7070102@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 66.237.13.5 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060508 Firefox/1.5.0.4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We are not running sendmail. We developed our own mail server in-house. We have a cluster of these mail servers sending spam traffic to a cluster of SA servers and we use the round-robin parameter when starting the spamd process and start the daemon with a ton of min/spare/max children. So we dont see the forking issue you mention.