From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757314Ab0CMCPH (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:15:07 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54621 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756118Ab0CMCPF (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:15:05 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: use statically initialized data attribute Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:08:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20100311083111.GA11183@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 58.89.190.212 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.14) Gecko/2009091010 Iceweasel/3.0.6 (Debian-3.0.6-1)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dmitry Torokhov gmail.com> writes: > There is no reason why we are using a template for binary attribute > and copying it into per-firmware data before registering. Using the > original works as well and gets rid of the following lockdep > compaint: [...] > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov mail.ru> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang