From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932168AbaIIGAI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 02:00:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54127 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752434AbaIIGAG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Sep 2014 02:00:06 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ted Percival Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: Resolve ambiguities in =?utf-8?b?X19nZXRfY3B1X3Zhci9jcHVtYXNrX3Zhcl90?= -fix Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 05:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20140908220654.GO17501@suse.de> <20140909003450.GA11623@mtj.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 76.27.34.2 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.94 Safari/537.36) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo kernel.org> writes: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 06:46:47PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > I already acked a patch like this today. > > It isn't in my inbox. It was "[PATCH] x86, apic: Fix unmasked CPU initialization" Sorry you weren't included; I used get_maintainer.pl for the recipient list. I also posted it with a smaller recipient list including you on Friday under the title "[PATCH] x86: Restore missing cpumask_copy() in __x2apic_send_IPI_mask" Good to see it's solved now anyway. Since I've been using the same patch for the last few days, Tested-by: Ted Percival