From: Andras Kovacs <neoteny@freemail.hu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question re: blk-mq and UFS driver
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 15:28:06 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20140916T172224-80@post.gmane.org> (raw)
Hi all,
Is it true that the blk-mq code is entirely transparent to low level drivers
(in particular to the UFS driver, ufshcd.c and associated files)? Or are
there any changes which have to be made to the UFS driver to take advantage
of the performance improvements flowing from the blk-mq code?
Any pointer would be greatly appreciated.
reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20140916T172224-80@post.gmane.org \
--to=neoteny@freemail.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®