From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753053AbaBLI1D (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:27:03 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:50217 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752094AbaBLIOE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:14:04 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "NeilBrown" , "Damian Nowak" Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:10:12 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 69/79] md/raid10: fix two bugs in handling of known-bad-blocks. In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 91.84.160.45 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2.55-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: NeilBrown commit b50c259e25d9260b9108dc0c2964c26e5ecbe1c1 upstream. If we discover a bad block when reading we split the request and potentially read some of it from a different device. The code path of this has two bugs in RAID10. 1/ we get a spin_lock with _irq, but unlock without _irq!! 2/ The calculation of 'sectors_handled' is wrong, as can be clearly seen by comparison with raid1.c This leads to at least 2 warnings and a probable crash is a RAID10 ever had known bad blocks. Fixes: 856e08e23762dfb92ffc68fd0a8d228f9e152160 Reported-by: Damian Nowak URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68181 Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ read_again: /* Could not read all from this device, so we will * need another r10_bio. */ - sectors_handled = (r10_bio->sectors + max_sectors + sectors_handled = (r10_bio->sector + max_sectors - bio->bi_sector); r10_bio->sectors = max_sectors; spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock); @@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ read_again: bio->bi_phys_segments = 2; else bio->bi_phys_segments++; - spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock); + spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock); /* Cannot call generic_make_request directly * as that will be queued in __generic_make_request * and subsequent mempool_alloc might block