From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755016AbaCaAJm (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2014 20:09:42 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:37332 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754271AbaC3Xmi (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2014 19:42:38 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Joe Thornber" , "Mike Snitzer" Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 027/200] dm space map common: make sure new space is used during extend In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.249 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2.56-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Joe Thornber commit 12c91a5c2d2a8e8cc40a9552313e1e7b0a2d9ee3 upstream. When extending a low level space map we should update nr_blocks at the start so the new space is used for the index entries. Otherwise extend can fail, e.g.: sm_metadata_extend call sequence that fails: -> sm_ll_extend -> dm_tm_new_block -> dm_sm_new_block -> sm_bootstrap_new_block => returns -ENOSPC because smm->begin == smm->ll.nr_blocks Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c +++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-space-map-common.c @@ -244,6 +244,10 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_ return -EINVAL; } + /* + * We need to set this before the dm_tm_new_block() call below. + */ + ll->nr_blocks = nr_blocks; for (i = old_blocks; i < blocks; i++) { struct dm_block *b; struct disk_index_entry idx; @@ -251,6 +255,7 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_ r = dm_tm_new_block(ll->tm, &dm_sm_bitmap_validator, &b); if (r < 0) return r; + idx.blocknr = cpu_to_le64(dm_block_location(b)); r = dm_tm_unlock(ll->tm, b); @@ -265,7 +270,6 @@ int sm_ll_extend(struct ll_disk *ll, dm_ return r; } - ll->nr_blocks = nr_blocks; return 0; }