From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754809AbaCaAQi (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2014 20:16:38 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:36381 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753018AbaC3XZC (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Mar 2014 19:25:02 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Borislav Petkov" Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 117/200] EDAC: Correct workqueue setup path In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.249 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2.56-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Borislav Petkov commit cb6ef42e516cb8948f15e4b70dc03af8020050a2 upstream. We're using edac_mc_workq_setup() both on the init path, when we load an edac driver and when we change the polling period (edac_mc_reset_delay_period) through /sys/.../edac_mc_poll_msec. On that second path we don't need to init the workqueue which has been initialized already. Thanks to Tejun for workqueue insights. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1391457913-881-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com [bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc.c @@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_function(struc * * called with the mem_ctls_mutex held */ -static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec) +static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, unsigned msec, + bool init) { debugf0("%s()\n", __func__); @@ -331,7 +332,9 @@ static void edac_mc_workq_setup(struct m if (mci->op_state != OP_RUNNING_POLL) return; - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function); + if (init) + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&mci->work, edac_mc_workq_function); + queue_delayed_work(edac_workqueue, &mci->work, msecs_to_jiffies(msec)); } @@ -391,7 +394,7 @@ void edac_mc_reset_delay_period(int valu list_for_each(item, &mc_devices) { mci = list_entry(item, struct mem_ctl_info, link); - edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, (unsigned long) value); + edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, value, false); } mutex_unlock(&mem_ctls_mutex); @@ -539,7 +542,7 @@ int edac_mc_add_mc(struct mem_ctl_info * /* This instance is NOW RUNNING */ mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_POLL; - edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec()); + edac_mc_workq_setup(mci, edac_mc_get_poll_msec(), true); } else { mci->op_state = OP_RUNNING_INTERRUPT; }