From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752858AbbHBALD (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2015 20:11:03 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:35977 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751782AbbHBAJs (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Aug 2015 20:09:48 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Wang Long" , "Steven Rostedt" Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 01:02:37 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.2 123/164] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.4.249 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.2.70-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Wang Long commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream. The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority, so correct it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Wang Long Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_ if (producer_fifo >= 0) { struct sched_param param = { - .sched_priority = consumer_fifo + .sched_priority = producer_fifo }; sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); } else