From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933455AbcHNLWB (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 07:22:01 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:51902 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933091AbcHNLAJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 07:00:09 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Steve French" , "Steve French" , "Pavel Shilovsky" Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 18:42:51 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 227/305] Fix reconnect to not defer smb3 session reconnect long after socket reconnect In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 92.40.249.202 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.37-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Steve French commit 4fcd1813e6404dd4420c7d12fb483f9320f0bf93 upstream. Azure server blocks clients that open a socket and don't do anything on it. In our reconnect scenarios, we can reconnect the tcp session and detect the socket is available but we defer the negprot and SMB3 session setup and tree connect reconnection until the next i/o is requested, but this looks suspicous to some servers who expect SMB3 negprog and session setup soon after a socket is created. In the echo thread, reconnect SMB3 sessions and tree connections that are disconnected. A later patch will replay persistent (and resilient) handle opens. Signed-off-by: Steve French Acked-by: Pavel Shilovsky Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/cifs/connect.c | 4 +++- fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c @@ -410,7 +410,9 @@ cifs_echo_request(struct work_struct *wo * server->ops->need_neg() == true. Also, no need to ping if * we got a response recently. */ - if (!server->ops->need_neg || server->ops->need_neg(server) || + + if (server->tcpStatus == CifsNeedReconnect || + server->tcpStatus == CifsExiting || server->tcpStatus == CifsNew || (server->ops->can_echo && !server->ops->can_echo(server)) || time_before(jiffies, server->lstrp + SMB_ECHO_INTERVAL - HZ)) goto requeue_echo; --- a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c @@ -1590,6 +1590,33 @@ SMB2_echo(struct TCP_Server_Info *server cifs_dbg(FYI, "In echo request\n"); + if (server->tcpStatus == CifsNeedNegotiate) { + struct list_head *tmp, *tmp2; + struct cifs_ses *ses; + struct cifs_tcon *tcon; + + cifs_dbg(FYI, "Need negotiate, reconnecting tcons\n"); + spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); + list_for_each(tmp, &server->smb_ses_list) { + ses = list_entry(tmp, struct cifs_ses, smb_ses_list); + list_for_each(tmp2, &ses->tcon_list) { + tcon = list_entry(tmp2, struct cifs_tcon, + tcon_list); + /* add check for persistent handle reconnect */ + if (tcon && tcon->need_reconnect) { + spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); + rc = smb2_reconnect(SMB2_ECHO, tcon); + spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); + } + } + } + spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); + } + + /* if no session, renegotiate failed above */ + if (server->tcpStatus == CifsNeedNegotiate) + return -EIO; + rc = small_smb2_init(SMB2_ECHO, NULL, (void **)&req); if (rc) return rc;