From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754188AbdBPAcn (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:32:43 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:53697 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752486AbdBOXJm (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:09:42 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Cong Wang" , "Oliver Hartkopp" , "Andrey Konovalov" , "Marc Kleine-Budde" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:41:40 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 194/306] can: bcm: fix warning in bcm_connect/proc_register In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:6f00:88c8:c921:d332 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.40-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Oliver Hartkopp commit deb507f91f1adbf64317ad24ac46c56eeccfb754 upstream. Andrey Konovalov reported an issue with proc_register in bcm.c. As suggested by Cong Wang this patch adds a lock_sock() protection and a check for unsuccessful proc_create_data() in bcm_connect(). Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=147732648731237 Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov Suggested-by: Cong Wang Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Acked-by: Cong Wang Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- net/can/bcm.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/net/can/bcm.c +++ b/net/can/bcm.c @@ -1499,24 +1499,31 @@ static int bcm_connect(struct socket *so struct sockaddr_can *addr = (struct sockaddr_can *)uaddr; struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct bcm_sock *bo = bcm_sk(sk); + int ret = 0; if (len < sizeof(*addr)) return -EINVAL; - if (bo->bound) - return -EISCONN; + lock_sock(sk); + + if (bo->bound) { + ret = -EISCONN; + goto fail; + } /* bind a device to this socket */ if (addr->can_ifindex) { struct net_device *dev; dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, addr->can_ifindex); - if (!dev) - return -ENODEV; - + if (!dev) { + ret = -ENODEV; + goto fail; + } if (dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN) { dev_put(dev); - return -ENODEV; + ret = -ENODEV; + goto fail; } bo->ifindex = dev->ifindex; @@ -1527,17 +1534,24 @@ static int bcm_connect(struct socket *so bo->ifindex = 0; } - bo->bound = 1; - if (proc_dir) { /* unique socket address as filename */ sprintf(bo->procname, "%lu", sock_i_ino(sk)); bo->bcm_proc_read = proc_create_data(bo->procname, 0644, proc_dir, &bcm_proc_fops, sk); + if (!bo->bcm_proc_read) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto fail; + } } - return 0; + bo->bound = 1; + +fail: + release_sock(sk); + + return ret; } static int bcm_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,