From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C15C64EAD for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FE6206B8 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:02:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 93FE6206B8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=decadent.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728669AbeI3EcR (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2018 00:32:17 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:51534 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726491AbeI3ESU (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2018 00:18:20 -0400 Received: from [2a02:8011:400e:2:cbab:f00:c93f:614] (helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g6N60-0000HB-SJ; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:48:16 +0100 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1g6N5v-0006qN-MO; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:48:11 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Kees Cook" , "Thomas Gleixner" Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 22:43:07 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) Subject: [PATCH 3.16 019/131] seccomp: Enable speculation flaw mitigations In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a02:8011:400e:2:cbab:f00:c93f:614 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.59-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Kees Cook commit 5c3070890d06ff82eecb808d02d2ca39169533ef upstream. When speculation flaw mitigations are opt-in (via prctl), using seccomp will automatically opt-in to these protections, since using seccomp indicates at least some level of sandboxing is desired. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [bwh: Backported to 3.16: - Apply to current task - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- kernel/seccomp.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ #include #include #include +#include +#include #include #include #include @@ -205,9 +207,24 @@ static inline bool seccomp_may_assign_mo return true; } +/* + * If a given speculation mitigation is opt-in (prctl()-controlled), + * select it, by disabling speculation (enabling mitigation). + */ +static inline void spec_mitigate(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long which) +{ + int state = arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(task, which); + + if (state > 0 && (state & PR_SPEC_PRCTL)) + arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_DISABLE); +} + static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(unsigned long seccomp_mode) { current->seccomp.mode = seccomp_mode; + /* Assume seccomp processes want speculation flaw mitigation. */ + spec_mitigate(current, PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS); set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_SECCOMP); }