From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908F3C07E85 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FFEE20661 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 22:10:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5FFEE20661 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=decadent.org.uk Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727987AbeLIWK0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:10:26 -0500 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:37548 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727125AbeLIWKX (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 17:10:23 -0500 Received: from pub.yeoldevic.com ([81.174.156.145] helo=deadeye) by shadbolt.decadent.org.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gW738-0002iY-8g; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:42 +0000 Received: from ben by deadeye with local (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gW72f-0003TT-JN; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:55:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Hutchings To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, "Theodore Ts'o" Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 21:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: LinuxStableQueue (scripts by bwh) X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Subject: [PATCH 3.16 189/328] ext4: fix online resizing for bigalloc file systems with a 1k block size In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.174.156.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.16.62-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Theodore Ts'o commit 5f8c10936fab2b69a487400f2872902e597dd320 upstream. An online resize of a file system with the bigalloc feature enabled and a 1k block size would be refused since ext4_resize_begin() did not understand s_first_data_block is 0 for all bigalloc file systems, even when the block size is 1k. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- fs/ext4/resize.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ int ext4_resize_begin(struct super_block *sb) { + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb); int ret = 0; if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) @@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ int ext4_resize_begin(struct super_block * because the user tools have no way of handling this. Probably a * bad time to do it anyways. */ - if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh->b_blocknr != + if (EXT4_B2C(sbi, sbi->s_sbh->b_blocknr) != le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_first_data_block)) { ext4_warning(sb, "won't resize using backup superblock at %llu", (unsigned long long)EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh->b_blocknr);