mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:29:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m11wpxm4sy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m164f9m6dy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:55:21 -0600")

ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the
> outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64.  This actually
> takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture
> dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture.
>
> So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures
> will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble.
>
> msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code.
> msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts
> msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code.
> msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64
> htirq: Tidy up the htirq code
>
> Eric

Grr.. My ia64 compiler is way too slow.  It just told me I had some
trivial bugs in the altix portion of what I posted.   Sorry I forgot
to mention all I can do is compile test ia64.

So here comes a second time with code that actually compiles :)

Darn this code that is so ugly that you have to test the cleanup on
multiple architectures!

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-09-27 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-27 19:55 Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/5] msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/5] msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 19:58 ` [PATCH 3/5] msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 19:58 ` [PATCH 4/5] msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64 Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 19:58 ` [PATCH 5/5] htirq: Tidy up the htirq code Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 20:29 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-09-27 22:36 ` [PATCH 0/5] Message signaled irq handling cleanups Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-09-27 22:51   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-27 19:54 Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 19:54 Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-27 22:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-09-28  4:02   ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m11wpxm4sy.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome