From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933217AbXCVPbR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:31:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933192AbXCVPbR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:31:17 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:53153 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933217AbXCVPbQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:31:16 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Ian Kent Cc: Herbert Poetzl , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Cedric Le Goater , sukadev@us.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Replace pid_t in autofs with struct pid reference References: <1174063618.3397.58.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070319200839.GB19449@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20070320201548.GA21312@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20070320214125.GA5585@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20070321205834.GB21517@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <1174530523.4635.25.camel@raven.themaw.net> <20070322143312.GA17784@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <1174575837.4635.68.camel@raven.themaw.net> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:29:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1174575837.4635.68.camel@raven.themaw.net> (Ian Kent's message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2007 00:03:57 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ian Kent writes: > btw please don't be confused by my use of "user space application". In > my comments I'm talking about applications that are similar in function > to autofs itself and not processes that might trigger mounts. For > example the "autodir" package uses the autofs filesystem to provide > dynamic home directory creation. The point being that we can't know what > an application may do with the info in a request packet so we need to be > sure we cover all the cases. A sentiment I share, and the reason why it is taking so long to come up with a patch for autofs4 that passes review. Eric