From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Tolentino, Matthew E" <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [CFT][PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 remove x86 boot page tables
Date: 03 Mar 2004 01:15:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14qt64a8c.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D36CE1FCEFD3524B81CA12C6FE5BCAB002FFE999@fmsmsx406.fm.intel.com>
"Tolentino, Matthew E" <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com> writes:
> > I have rewritten and compiled tested the boot_ioremap code but I don't
> > have a configuration to test it. This effects the EFI code and the
> > numa srat code. It might be worth replacing boot_ioremap with __va()
> > to reduce the amount of error checking necessary.
>
> I just blindly applied this patch and tried it on an x86 EFI system
> with no luck. It's not mapping correctly for some reason. I'll look
> at the problem closer in a bit.
Stupid question. What is efi doing in arch/i386 anyway?
All of the to be production efi x86 systems I have heard of support
x86-64. So shouldn't it be 64bit calls that we need to worry about?
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-01 18:13 Tolentino, Matthew E
2004-03-02 5:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-03 6:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-03 8:15 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-03 19:45 Tolentino, Matthew E
2004-03-05 14:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-01 7:32 Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-01 19:05 ` Dave Hansen
2004-03-02 5:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-02 6:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-03-02 17:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-02 9:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m14qt64a8c.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®