From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262010AbREUTBs>; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:01:48 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262015AbREUTB2>; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:01:28 -0400
Received: from fenrus.demon.co.uk ([158.152.228.152]:6025 "EHLO
	amadeus.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262010AbREUTBW>;
	Mon, 21 May 2001 15:01:22 -0400
Message-Id: <m151jzx-000OerC@amadeus.home.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:21:01 +0100 (BST)
From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl
To: Mike Castle <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20010520185827.B16356@thune.mrc-home.com>
X-Newsgroups: fenrus.linux.kernel
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3-6.0.1 (i586))
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <20010520185827.B16356@thune.mrc-home.com> you wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:29:17AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> distributions). 18 months is more realistic for it to be deployed
>> widely enough.

> People who are going to be savvy enough to install a development 2.5.*
> kernel that is defining a new configuration utility are going to be savvy
> enough to install python.

In the first months, yes. Once we freeze you've just lost a major part of
your testersbase...