From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:45:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:44:53 -0400 Received: from fenrus.demon.co.uk ([158.152.228.152]:41889 "EHLO amadeus.home.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:44:38 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:44:30 +0100 (BST) From: arjan@fenrus.demon.nl To: ttsig@tuxyturvy.com (Tom Sightler) Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac9 cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <002e01c0eead$03c6d890$26040a0a@zeusinc.com> X-Newsgroups: fenrus.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.3-6.0.1 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <002e01c0eead$03c6d890$26040a0a@zeusinc.com> you wrote: >> 2.4.5-ac9 >> o Fix xircom_cb problems with some cisco kit (Ion Badulescu) > One other note, the version in 2.4.4-ac11 is listed as 1.33 while the > version in 2.4.5-ac9 is 1.11, why did we go backwards? Were there > significant problems with the newer version? The 1.33 sure seems to work > better for me. It went backwards because I switched from my local CVS repository to the tulip driver one. I appologize for the driver not working as well as expected, and will try to find a way to make it work for everyone . Greetings, Arjan van de Ven