From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ebiederm@xmission.com, mingo <mingo@redhat.com>,
tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>, hpa <hpa@zytor.com>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] x86_32: fix VisualWS and Voyager kexec build failures
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:49:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17ifgrbtg.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080401104950.83b02073.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (Randy Dunlap's message of "Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:49:50 -0700")
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> writes:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>
> cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Both Visual WS and Voyager builds fail in almost the same way (in
> linux-next) without this patch:
>
> VOYAGER:
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `crash_kexec':
> (.text+0x28588): undefined reference to `machine_crash_shutdown'
>
> VISWS:
> kernel/built-in.o: In function `crash_kexec':
> /next-20080401/kernel/kexec.c:1074: undefined reference to
> `machine_crash_shutdown'
> make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> because arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c isn't built since CONFIG_X86_BIOS_REBOOT=n,
> so machine_crash_shutdown() isn't available.
Weird. I haven't had a chance to update to the devel kernels lately.
And in the older kernel I have machine_crash_shutdown is in crash.c
and is indeed not dependent xyz.
I get the feeling someone refactored something and ran afoul of the
x86_32 weird subarchitecture stuff in their testing.
> This patch does seem a small bit odd since the KEXEC help text says that
> kexec is independent of the system firmware.
Yes.
> Eric, is there some other way that this should be handled?
Yes. Move machine_crash_shutdown back into crash.c
Or find some other way to accomplish whatever cleanup was done,
so that we still compile.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 17:49 Randy Dunlap
2008-04-02 6:49 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2008-04-02 16:56 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m17ifgrbtg.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®