From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, norsk5@xmission.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + edac-new-opteron-athlon64-memory-controller-driver.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:43:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17j2qy0w8.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060706191804.GB97717@muc.de> (Andi Kleen's message of "6 Jul 2006 21:18:04 +0200, Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:18:04 +0200")
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:09:35PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> > Then anything with MMIO or interrupts or anything dynamic
>> > definitely belongs into kernel space agreed.
>>
>> Yep we sometimes have to mess with MMIO.
>
> Not on K8 at least, no?
>
> Maybe we should discuss each chipset separatedly :)
:)
>> > But at least on K8 DIMM inventory is purely reading PCI config space on
>> > something that doesn't change and doesn't need any locking.
>> > It also doesn't need to do anything complicated, but just look
>> > for the right PCI ID.
>>
>> Mostly. Except for the part where you have to figure out the stepping
>> of the processor connected to the memory controller to properly decode
>> the registers. AMD should have used the revision field in pci config
>> space but...
>
> That's in /proc/cpuinfo
Some of it. Taking a quick glance I can't seem to see a nodeid field.
Not that it especially likely you would have a system with mixed revision
cpus (it is a pain in the BIOS) but since it is possible it at least make
sense to try.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-06 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060701150430.GA38488@muc.de>
[not found] ` <20060703172633.50366.qmail@web50109.mail.yahoo.com>
[not found] ` <20060703184836.GA46236@muc.de>
[not found] ` <1151962114.16528.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2006-07-04 9:23 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-04 10:09 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-04 11:34 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-05 22:08 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-05 22:04 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-06 6:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 13:01 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-06 15:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 16:51 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-06 17:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 18:08 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-06 18:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-07-06 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-06 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 19:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-07-06 19:43 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-07-06 18:43 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-05 17:39 ` Doug Thompson
2006-07-05 19:39 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m17j2qy0w8.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=norsk5@xmission.com \
--cc=norsk5@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®