mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: Rework the console spawning variables.
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 14:10:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m18xkreb42.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060910142942.GA7384@oleg> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:29:42 +0400")

Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:

> On 09/09, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> This patch does several things.
>> - The variables used are moved into a structure and declared in vt_kern.h
>> - A spinlock is added so we don't have SMP races updating the values.
>> - Instead of raw pid_t value a struct_pid is used to guard against
>>   pid wrap around issues, if the daemon to spawn a new console dies.
>
> I am not arguing against this patch, but it's a pity we can't use 'struct pid'
> lockless. What dou you think about this:

Actually with xchg I can use a reference counted struct pid lockless.
In the general case you have more then one variable you want to keep
in sync and you need the lock for that.

rcu is definitely not the solution in these cases as the struct pid
is stored for a long time so we need the reference count.

It might make sense to have some helper code makes that wraps
the following line so it is obvious you can do this.

put_pid(xchg(&vc->vt_pid, get_pid(task_pid(current))));

Perhaps:
void update_pid(struct pid **ref, struct pid *new)
{
        struct pid *old;
        get_pid(new);
        old = xchg(ref, new);
        put_pid(old);
}

But since I can write it as a moderately clear one liner in the
case that matters I don't much care.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-10 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-10  4:21 Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-10 14:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-09-10 20:10   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-09-10 20:33     ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-09-10 22:56       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-11  1:05         ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-09-11  2:40           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-11  2:59             ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-09-11  5:01               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m18xkreb42.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome