From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
andrea <andrea@suse.de>, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
Date: 30 Jan 2004 17:17:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1ad45x986.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1075344395.1592.87.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> writes:
> All,
> This is my port of the x86-64 vsyscall gettimeofday code to
> i386. This patch moves gettimeofday into userspace, so it can be called
> without the syscall overhead, greatly improving performance. This is
> important for any application, like a database, which heavily uses
> gettimeofday for timestamping. It supports both the TSC and IBM x44X
> cyclone time source.
>
> Example performance gain: (vs. int80)
> Normal gettimeofday
> gettimeofday ( 1665576us / 1000000runs ) = 1.665574us
> vsyscall LD_PRELOAD gettimeofday
> gettimeofday ( 868378us / 1000000runs ) = 0.868377us
And what is the performance gain over using the kernel sysenter
implementation?
> This patch becomes especially important with the introduction of the
> 4G/4G split, as there the syscall overhead is greatly increased.
>
> Example gain w/ 4/4g split: (vs. int80)
> Normal gettimeofday
> gettimeofday ( 7210630us / 1000000runs ) = 7.210623us
> vsyscall LD_PRELOAD gettimeofday
> gettimeofday ( 844855us / 1000000runs ) = 0.844854us
This is clear evidence that the 4g/4g kernel has significant overhead,
suggesting that a 64bit kernel should be used if you care about
syscall performance with gobs of RAM.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-31 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-29 2:46 john stultz
2004-01-29 5:06 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-29 13:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-29 18:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-29 19:15 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-29 23:59 ` john stultz
2004-01-30 0:40 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30 0:31 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30 4:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-30 5:09 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-03 4:38 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30 17:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-30 8:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-30 17:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-31 0:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-31 2:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-31 5:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-02-01 1:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 4:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-03 5:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 8:52 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 16:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 17:37 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 18:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 18:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 18:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-01-31 0:17 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2004-01-31 2:20 ` john stultz
[not found] <1075344395.1592.87.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <401894DA.7000609@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040201012803.GN26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <401F251C.2090300@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040203085224.GA15738@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040203162515.GY26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040203173716.GC17895@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040203181001.GA26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040203182310.GA18326@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-04 2:27 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-04 2:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-04 4:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-05 21:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-06 4:15 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-06 4:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-06 9:23 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-06 15:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07 0:37 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-07 2:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07 3:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-07 4:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07 4:53 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1ad45x986.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome