mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	andrea <andrea@suse.de>, Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>,
	Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
	Chris McDermott <lcm@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.2-rc2_vsyscall-gtod_B1.patch
Date: 30 Jan 2004 17:17:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1ad45x986.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1075344395.1592.87.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>

john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> writes:

> All,
>         This is my port of the x86-64 vsyscall gettimeofday code to
> i386. This patch moves gettimeofday into userspace, so it can be called
> without the syscall overhead, greatly improving performance. This is
> important for any application, like a database, which heavily uses
> gettimeofday for timestamping. It supports both the TSC and IBM x44X
> cyclone time source.

> 
> Example performance gain: (vs. int80)
> Normal gettimeofday 
> gettimeofday ( 1665576us / 1000000runs ) = 1.665574us
> vsyscall LD_PRELOAD gettimeofday
> gettimeofday ( 868378us / 1000000runs ) = 0.868377us

And what is the performance gain over using the kernel sysenter
implementation?

> This patch becomes especially important with the introduction of the
> 4G/4G split, as there the syscall overhead is greatly increased. 
> 
> Example gain w/ 4/4g split: (vs. int80)
> Normal gettimeofday 
> gettimeofday ( 7210630us / 1000000runs ) = 7.210623us
> vsyscall LD_PRELOAD gettimeofday
> gettimeofday ( 844855us / 1000000runs ) = 0.844854us

This is clear evidence that the 4g/4g kernel has significant overhead,
suggesting that a 64bit kernel should be used if you care about
syscall performance with gobs of RAM.

Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-31  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-29  2:46 john stultz
2004-01-29  5:06 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-29 13:26   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-29 18:05     ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-29 19:15       ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-29 23:59         ` john stultz
2004-01-30  0:40           ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30  0:31         ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30  4:17           ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-30  5:09             ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30  9:29               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-03  4:38                 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-01-30 17:34               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-30  8:33             ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-01-30 17:21               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-31  0:10     ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-01-31  2:41       ` Jamie Lokier
2004-01-31  5:54         ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-02-01  1:28   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03  4:35     ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-03  5:34       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03  8:52       ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 16:25         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 17:37           ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 18:10             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-03 18:23               ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-03 18:34                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-01-31  0:17 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2004-01-31  2:20   ` john stultz
     [not found] <1075344395.1592.87.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <401894DA.7000609@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <20040201012803.GN26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]     ` <401F251C.2090300@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]       ` <20040203085224.GA15738@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]         ` <20040203162515.GY26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]           ` <20040203173716.GC17895@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]             ` <20040203181001.GA26076@dualathlon.random.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]               ` <20040203182310.GA18326@mail.shareable.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-04  2:27                 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-04  2:40                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-04  4:21                   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-05 21:43                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-06  4:15                       ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-06  4:28                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-06  9:23                           ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-06 15:49                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07  0:37                               ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-02-07  2:19                                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07  3:37                                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-02-07  4:36                                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-02-07  4:53                                       ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1ad45x986.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lcm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome