From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>,
Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
fastboot <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Re: Query: Kdump: Core Image ELF Format
Date: 09 Mar 2005 23:56:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1br9skn0b.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1110430955.3574.11.camel@wks126478wss.in.ibm.com>
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@in.ibm.com> writes:
> I want to fill the virtual addresses of linearly mapped region. That is
> physical addresses from 0 to MAXMEM (896 MB) are mapped by kernel at
> virtual addresses PAGE_OFFSET to (PAGE_OFFSET + MAXMEM). Values of
> PAGE_OFFSET and MAXMEM are already known and hard-coded.
PAGE_OFFSET has a common value of 0xc0000000, on x86. However
that value is by no means fixed. The 4G/4G split changes it
as do some other patches floating around at the time.
On x86-64 I don't know how stable those kinds of offsets are.
> I think I used the terminology kernel virtual address and that is adding
> to the confusion. Kernel virtual addresses are not necessarily linearly
> mapped. What I meant was kernel logical addresses whose associated
> physical addresses differ only by a constant offset.
I know what you meant. I simply meant that things don't look that
constant to me. Especially in Linux where there are enough people
to try most of the reasonable possibilities.
I don't even think it is a bad idea. But I do think we have a different
idea of what is constant.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-10 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-08 12:50 vivek goyal
2005-03-08 15:14 ` Dave Anderson
2005-03-08 18:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-08 19:26 ` Dave Anderson
2005-03-08 18:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-09 6:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-03-09 14:17 ` [Fastboot] " Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-09 15:06 ` Dipankar Sarma
2005-03-10 7:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-10 5:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-03-10 6:56 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2005-03-15 5:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-03-10 8:16 ` Itsuro Oda
2005-03-09 6:57 ` Itsuro Oda
2005-03-23 4:26 ` Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao
2005-03-23 10:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2005-03-23 19:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-03-23 19:47 ` [Fastboot] " Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <200503300258.34239.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk>
2005-03-30 7:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1br9skn0b.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome