From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/14] kexec: i8259-sysfs.x86_64
Date: 22 Aug 2004 22:22:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1d61i4h64.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040821162417.7bad0b08.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> >
> > The i8259 does not yet have sysfs support on x86_64
>
> umm, yes it does. It went into Linus's tree post 2.6.8.1.
Sorry I missed that one. I'm surprised I did not get a reject
when I rebuilt that one against mm2. It appears I was in a bit
of a rush.
Or why it would be nice for this code to be merged :)
> I added the below make-it-compile patch. Please check it.
Please just remove the previous patch and it's fix from your patchset,
as together they are a noop.
The following patch simply adds a shutdown method to the x86_64
i8259 code. That is what I care about in the context of kexec.
While testing this I found a minor ide bug. I will have a patch for
that in a second.
Eric
diff -uNr linux-2.6.8.1-mm4/arch/x86_64/kernel/i8259.c linux-2.6.8.1-mm4-i8259-shutdown-x86_64/arch/x86_64/kernel/i8259.c
--- linux-2.6.8.1-mm4/arch/x86_64/kernel/i8259.c Sun Aug 22 20:56:01 2004
+++ linux-2.6.8.1-mm4-i8259-shutdown-x86_64/arch/x86_64/kernel/i8259.c Sun Aug 22 21:00:23 2004
@@ -416,10 +416,24 @@
return 0;
}
+
+
+static int i8259A_shutdown(struct sys_device *dev)
+{
+ /* Put the i8259A into a quiescent state that
+ * the kernel initialization code can get it
+ * out of.
+ */
+ outb(0xff, 0x21); /* mask all of 8259A-1 */
+ outb(0xff, 0xA1); /* mask all of 8259A-1 */
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct sysdev_class i8259_sysdev_class = {
set_kset_name("i8259"),
.suspend = i8259A_suspend,
.resume = i8259A_resume,
+ .shutdown = i8259A_shutdown,
};
static struct sys_device device_i8259A = {
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-23 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-20 17:57 Eric W. Biederman
2004-08-21 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-23 4:22 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1d61i4h64.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®