From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031281AbXDJRnK (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:43:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031285AbXDJRnK (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:43:10 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:53020 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031281AbXDJRnI (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:43:08 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Robin Holt , Linus Torvalds , Chris Snook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner , Roland McGrath , acahalan@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Only send pdeath_signal when getppid changes. References: <20070406104301.GB19755@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com> <20070406163100.GA554@tv-sign.ru> <20070406173249.GA2517@elte.hu> <20070410134814.GA28016@elte.hu> <20070410133808.GA163@tv-sign.ru> <20070410163714.GA104@tv-sign.ru> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:41:20 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20070410163714.GA104@tv-sign.ru> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:37:14 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg Nesterov writes: > On 04/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> So this patch fixes the pdeath_signal behaviour only sending a signal >> when the results of getppid would change. > > Don't get me wrong, I personally like this patch very much. However, Good point. I guess we have a simple question. Does a parent death signal make most sense between separately written programs? If so this patch is a bug fix. Does a parent death signal make most sense between processes that are part of a larger program. If so there is little point to this patch. Eric