From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Joshua Hudson" <joshudson@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wait4/waitpid/waitid oddness
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 13:19:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1fykpmbw2.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bda6d13a0604071158x33080de3ya8016dde59c2d97f@mail.gmail.com> (Joshua Hudson's message of "Fri, 7 Apr 2006 11:58:40 -0700")
"Joshua Hudson" <joshudson@gmail.com> writes:
> On 4/7/06, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>> "Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > The kernel prohibits:
>> >
>> > 1. WNOHANG on waitpid/wait4
>>
>> Not 2.6.17-rc1, and not for a lot of earlier kernels.
>> At least not on ingress, and just skimming the code
>> I can't see any deeper checks that would prevent this.
>>
>> > 2. __WALL on waitid
>> >
>> > Why? I need both at once.
>>
>> Which kernel is failing, and how?
>
> LKNL 2.6.16.1 has this check. Haven't checked any others.
So what I see current in wait4 is:
> asmlinkage long sys_wait4(pid_t pid, int __user *stat_addr,
> int options, struct rusage __user *ru)
> {
> long ret;
>
> if (options & ~(WNOHANG|WUNTRACED|WCONTINUED|
> __WNOTHREAD|__WCLONE|__WALL))
> return -EINVAL;
This denies access if you use other flags but it should allow
__WALL and WNOHANG together. I didn't see anything in do_wait,
that would prohibit this.
> ret = do_wait(pid, options | WEXITED, NULL, stat_addr, ru);
>
> /* avoid REGPARM breakage on x86: */
> prevent_tail_call(ret);
> return ret;
> }
So where are you seeing the check in 2.6.16.1?
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-07 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-06 3:38 Albert Cahalan
2006-04-07 2:09 ` Joshua Hudson
2006-04-07 5:38 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-04-07 6:40 ` Joshua Hudson
2006-04-07 6:50 ` Neil Brown
2006-04-07 7:09 ` Joshua Hudson
2006-04-07 18:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-04-07 18:58 ` Joshua Hudson
2006-04-07 19:19 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-04-07 19:24 ` Joshua Hudson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1fykpmbw2.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=joshudson@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®