From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755691AbYEaCbP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 22:31:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751647AbYEaCa5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 22:30:57 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:33521 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbYEaCa4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 May 2008 22:30:56 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: akpm@linuxfoundation.org, Chris Wright , stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com, adobriyan@gmail.com, morgan@kernel.org, xemul@openvz.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <200805292349.m4TNneua029348@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20080530161857.25e3fbc5@extreme> <20080530191053.34182eaf@extreme> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 19:29:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20080530191053.34182eaf@extreme> (Stephen Hemminger's message of "Fri, 30 May 2008 19:10:53 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 24.130.11.59 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Stephen Hemminger X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4447] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: allow override of /proc/sys/net with CAP_NET_ADMIN X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Hemminger writes: > Unnecessary, it is a property of the root, and there is only one call to > register_sysctl_root > in the current code, and that registers the net_sysctl_root structure. Oh right. I was thinking it was a property of the ctl_table_header. My mistake. Then this is essentially the perfect place to put it. Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Eric