From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1766832AbXDSPwL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:52:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1766828AbXDSPwL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:52:11 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:40112 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766824AbXDSPwJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:52:09 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: David Howells Cc: ", containers@lists.osdl.org, Oleg Nesterov , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream References: <11769696211263-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <29341.1176975158@redhat.com> <2969.1176992303@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:50:42 -0600 In-Reply-To: <2969.1176992303@redhat.com> (David Howells's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:18:23 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Howells writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> What is the ETA on your patches? > > That depends on Dave Miller now, I think. I'm assuming they need to go > through the network GIT tree to get to Linus. Certainly Andrew Morton seems > to think so. Ok. I don't see any patches in -mm so I was assuming these patches have not been queued up anywhere. As long as these things happen in a reasonably timely manner so I can remove the export of kernel_thread and kill daemonize I really don't care. If you have written them they are quite likely better then my minimal patches which were quite restrained because of my limited ability to test these things. Eric