From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] x86_64: Fix apicid versus cpu# confusion.
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:26:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1hddvwzke.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050811233302.GA8974@wotan.suse.de> (Andi Kleen's message of "Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:33:02 +0200")
Ok being impatient not wanting this tiny bug to be forgotten for
2.6.13. Linus please apply this micro patch.
> > static void __cpuinit tsc_sync_wait(void)
> > {
> > if (notscsync || !cpu_has_tsc)
> > return;
> > - printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d: Syncing TSC to CPU %u.\n", smp_processor_id(),
> > - boot_cpu_id);
> > - sync_tsc();
> > + sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id);
>
> I actually found a bug in this today. This should be sync_tsc(0), not
> sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id)
> Can you just fix it in your tree or should I submit a new patch?
>
> -Andi
Oops. I knew I didn't have the physical versus logical cpu identifiers right
when I generated that patch. It's not nearly as bad as I feared at the time
though.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
5192895f71c7eff7e1335cd9d6a775dda2bb5d52
diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void __cpuinit tsc_sync_wait(void
{
if (notscsync || !cpu_has_tsc)
return;
- sync_tsc(boot_cpu_id);
+ sync_tsc(0);
}
static __init int notscsync_setup(char *s)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-12 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 22:54 [patch 0/8] -stable review Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 1/8] [PATCH] sys_set_mempolicy() doesnt check if mode < 0 Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 2/8] [PATCH] Fix SRAT for non dual core AMD systems Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 3/8] [PATCH] x86_64: Fixing smpboot timing problem Chris Wright
2005-08-11 23:33 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-11 23:43 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-12 2:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-12 4:26 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2005-08-12 5:51 ` [PATCH] x86_64: Fix apicid versus cpu# confusion yhlu
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 4/8] [PATCH] Update in-kernel zlib routines Chris Wright
2005-08-12 0:01 ` Peter Osterlund
2005-08-12 0:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 5/8] Check input buffer size in zisofs Chris Wright
2005-08-12 1:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-08-12 1:16 ` Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 6/8] CAN-2005-2098 Error during attempt to join key management session can leave semaphore pinned Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 7/8] CAN-2005-2099 Destruction of failed keyring oopses Chris Wright
2005-08-11 22:54 ` [patch 8/8] [PATCH] Module per-cpu alignment cannot always be met Chris Wright
2005-08-22 6:58 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1hddvwzke.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=chuckw@quantumlinux.com \
--cc=jmforbes@linuxtx.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®