From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:14:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1k4hjqzql.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik+N5J-MDrbMbtwRPwz==J4y8sbBkhir=1K3g=B@mail.gmail.com> (Lucian Adrian Grijincu's message of "Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:46:42 +0200")
Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>> What kernel has a dentry_path_raw? Perhaps you mean __dentry_path?
>
>
> See the function here:
> https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6/blob/70d1f365568e0cdbc9f4ab92428e1830fdb09ab0/fs/dcache.c
>
> The last patches were against 2.6.38-rc2 because the dcache layer got
> rewritten in 2.6.38 http://lwn.net/Articles/421784/
>
> __dentry_path is now static (in fs/dcache.c) and does not take the
> necessary locks.
Thanks. I thought I was looking at the latest source but it turns out
I fat fingered something and my tree was still 2.6.36-rc3. Sigh.
dentry_path_raw does seem reasonable.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-01 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-01 0:17 [PATCH] " Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 1:32 ` [PATCH] security: remove unused security_sysctl hook Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 15:02 ` [PATCH] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 15:53 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 15:59 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 16:32 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 16:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] security: remove unused security_sysctl hook Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 19:05 ` Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 20:06 ` Eric Paris
2011-02-14 19:33 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-14 19:53 ` Eric Paris
2011-02-14 20:06 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-14 22:06 ` James Morris
2011-02-01 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] security/selinux: fix /proc/sys/ labeling Stephen Smalley
2011-02-01 19:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-01 19:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-02-01 19:46 ` Lucian Adrian Grijincu
2011-02-01 20:14 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1k4hjqzql.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucian.grijincu@gmail.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome