From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Terence Ripperda <tripperda@nvidia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PAT support
Date: 14 Apr 2004 22:05:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1k70h6g3e.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <407B7BDE.5030002@colorfullife.com>
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> writes:
> Hi Terence,
>
> in your patch, you write
> +/* Here is the PAT's default layout on ia32 cpus when we are done.
> + * PAT0: Write Back
> + * PAT1: Write Combine
> + * PAT2: Uncached
> + * PAT3: Uncacheable
> + * PAT4: Write Through
> + * PAT5: Write Protect
> + * PAT6: Uncached
> + * PAT7: Uncacheable
>
> Is that layout possible?
> There is an errata in the B2 and C1 stepping of the Pentium 4 cpus that results
> in incorrect PAT numbers: the highest bit is ignored by the CPU under some
> circumstances. There's a similar errata (E27) that affects all Pentium 3 cpus:
> The highest bit is always ignored.
> I think we need a fallback to 4 PAT entries.
Write Through and Write Protect are essentially useless. So that should
be easy to do.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-13 5:34 Manfred Spraul
2004-04-13 14:02 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-13 16:40 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-04-15 4:05 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-15 21:38 Albert Cahalan
[not found] <1KifY-uA-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-04-13 0:01 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-13 16:21 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-04-14 0:58 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-16 18:07 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-04-17 0:42 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-19 22:54 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-04-20 18:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-21 23:19 ` Terence Ripperda
2004-04-22 4:21 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-15 4:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-04-15 16:38 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-15 18:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-04-12 22:29 Terence Ripperda
2004-04-13 8:36 ` Andy Whitcroft
2004-04-13 16:50 ` Terence Ripperda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1k70h6g3e.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=tripperda@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®