mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH  0/8] tip related: radix tree for spareseirq and logical flat clean up
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:04:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1ljexpcjp.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7676BB.8030608@kernel.org> (Yinghai Lu's message of "Sat\, 13 Feb 2010 01\:54\:03 -0800")

Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:

> On 02/12/2010 07:44 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> writes:
>> 
>>> ---------spareirq radix tree related ----------------
>>> 94007e8: irq: remove not need bootmem code
>>> 4b0d3fa: radix: move radix init early
>>> 56af1a9: sparseirq: change irq_desc_ptrs to static
>>> b236235: sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array
>>> 5918787: x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs
>>>
>>> so could reduce nr_irqs limitation for bunch ixgbe...
>>>
>>> ---------------x86 logical flat related -----------
>>> f5954c4: use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early
>>> 7b8d6a9: x86: use num_processors for possible cpus
>>> d79d1de: x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit
>> 
>> Thanks for keeping this work alive.
>> 
>> I just skimmed through do_IRQ and I happened to notice that
>> we have an unnecessary inefficiency that using a radix tree for
>> irq_to_desc will magnify.
>> 
>> handle_irq should take an struct irq_desc * instead of a unsigned int irq.
>> 
>> and the per cpu vector_irq array should become a per cpu vector_desc array.
>> 
>> As soon as irq_to_desc is more than &irq_desc[irq] this saves us work
>> and cache line misses  at the cost of a simple code cleanup.
>> 
>
> please check
>
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: use vector_desc instead of vector_irq
>
> Eric pointed out that radix tree version of irq_to_desc will magnify delay on the path
> of handle_irq.
> use vector_desc to reduce the calling of irq_to_desc.
>
> next step: need to change all ack, mask, umask, eoi for all irq_chip to take irq_desc
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> @@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static void __init lguest_init_IRQ(void)
>  
>  	for (i = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; i < NR_VECTORS; i++) {
>  		/* Some systems map "vectors" to interrupts weirdly.  Not us! */
> -		__get_cpu_var(vector_irq)[i] = i - FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR;
> +		__get_cpu_var(vector_desc)[i] = irq_to_desc(i - FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR);
>  		if (i != SYSCALL_VECTOR)
>  			set_intr_gate(i, interrupt[i - FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR]);
>  	}

YH It appears that irq_to_desc_alloc_node has not been called yet
so the setting of vector_desc needs to move to lguest_setup_irq.

Eric




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-13 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-13  2:49 Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] irq: remove not need bootmem code Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 2/8] radix: move radix init early Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 3/8] sparseirq: change irq_desc_ptrs to static Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 4/8] sparseirq: use radix_tree instead of ptrs array Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 6/8] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86: use num_processors for possible cpus Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  2:49 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13  3:44 ` [PATCH 0/8] tip related: radix tree for spareseirq and logical flat clean up Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-13  3:49   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-13  4:17     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-13 22:12       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-02-13 22:26         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-13  9:54   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13 11:39     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-13 12:04     ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2010-02-13 22:40       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13 23:14         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-13 23:59           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-14  0:30             ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-14  0:49               ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-18  2:49               ` [PATCH 1/3] xen: Remove unnecessary arch specific xen irq functions Yinghai Lu
2010-02-19  1:36                 ` [tip:x86/irq] " tip-bot for Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]               ` <4B7CA9A1.3020806@kernel.org>
2010-02-18  2:49                 ` [PATCH 0/3] radix tree spareirq addon cleanup Yinghai Lu
2010-02-18  2:50                 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: use vector_desc instead of vector_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-02-18 17:22                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-23  6:39                     ` [PATCH -v3 1/2] " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-23  6:44                       ` [PATCH -v2 2/2] genericirq: change ack/mask in irq_chip to take irq_desc instead of irq Yinghai Lu
2010-02-24 21:36                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-24 22:07                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-25  0:22                             ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-02 14:58                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-03  8:49                             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-03 10:26                               ` Thomas Gleixner
     [not found]                       ` <4B84F013.9040708@kernel.org>
2010-02-24  9:26                         ` [PATCH -v3 " Yinghai Lu
2010-02-24  9:27                       ` [PATCH -v4 1/2] x86: use vector_desc instead of vector_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-02-18  2:50                 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] genericirq: change ack/mask in irq_chip to take irq_desc in addition to irq Yinghai Lu
2010-02-18 17:04                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-18 17:13                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-18 19:51                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-02-13 12:26     ` [PATCH 0/8] tip related: radix tree for spareseirq and logical flat clean up Eric W. Biederman
2010-02-13 22:36       ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1ljexpcjp.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome