From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Salyzyn, Mark" <mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] irq-remove: scsi driver trivial
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:46:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1lk9proe0.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4722E360.7000305@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2007 03:06:08 -0400")
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> writes:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:37:47 -0400
>> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>>> the other serious question is.. how is IRQ_HANDLER_V3 different
>>>> from a #ifdef VERSION >= 2.6.24 .....
>>>> it's not really ;)
>>> Note my mention of backport -- kernel version isn't relevant when the various
>>> enterprise distros have random featuresets under random
>>> kernel versions.
>>>
>>
>> yeah and THEY can put the defines in (RH used to do this fwiw as a
>> generic "this is a RH kernel" define)....
>>
>> but afaik no distro vendor backports such an api change nowadays... and
>> hasn't in 2.6 ever
>
> People backport drivers all the time that must support a wide range of kernels.
I thought the argument was not that drivers are back ported but that
internal kernel APIs changes aren't backported. So that testing
the kernel version actually has a chance as a reasonable test for
features.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-27 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-19 7:54 [PATCH 0/9] Remove 'irq' argument from all irq handlers Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 7:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] irq-remove: core Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 17:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 17:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 18:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 18:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 19:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 19:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 23:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 23:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 23:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 7:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] irq-remove: arch non-trivial Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 16:54 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-19 17:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 17:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 17:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 17:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 19:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 7:56 ` [PATCH 3/9] irq-remove: arch trivial Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 7:56 ` [PATCH 4/9] irq-remove: driver non-trivial Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 18:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 18:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 7:57 ` [PATCH 5/9] irq-remove: net driver trivial Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 7:57 ` [PATCH 6/9] irq-remove: sound " Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 7:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] irq-remove: scsi " Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 13:00 ` Salyzyn, Mark
2007-10-26 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-26 21:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-26 23:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-27 0:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-27 0:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-27 0:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-27 5:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-27 7:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-27 7:46 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-10-27 14:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-10-19 7:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] irq-remove: " Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 7:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] irq-remove: misc fixes and cleanups Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 14:53 ` [PATCH 0/9] Remove 'irq' argument from all irq handlers Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 18:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 18:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 19:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 19:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-19 19:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-19 19:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-10-19 19:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19 18:45 ` Mark Gross
2007-10-20 6:07 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1lk9proe0.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®